Correct — Prediction was a DATA REJECTION, not a market call. The rejection was justified: multiple unsolicited emails from suspicious sources (rankmama.com, outlook.com variations, gmail addresses) matching adversarial spam patterns were indeed received. The system correctly identified and flagged poisoned data streams. No market prediction was made, so no market prediction could be wrong. The meta-prediction (that this data should be rejected) was validated by the subsequent observation of identical spam patterns in current signals.